Wed. Feb 12th, 2025

Amendment 1: Iowans could have a state right to own firearms<!-- wp:html --><p class="copyright">Getty Images; Insider</p> <p>Amendment 1 would give citizens the right in the state constitution to bear arms.<br /> Proponents say that it will help protect citizens' right to carry and own firearms in the state.<br /> Opponents say it will prevent lawmakers from passing gun safety laws.</p> <p>A "yes" on Iowa's Amendment 1 would amend the state's constitution to give citizens a right to keep and bear arms.</p> <h2>Ballot measure details</h2> <p><a href="https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislation/BillBook?ga=88&ba=SJR18">Amendment 1</a> would add the following text to the state's constitution: "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The sovereign state of Iowa affirms and recognizes this right to be a fundamental individual right. Any and all restrictions of this right shall be subject to strict scrutiny."</p> <p>Strict scrutiny is the most restrictive form of judicial review. It requires proposed laws must have a compelling and specific government interest in order to violate an amendment. This would mean that many laws that could restrict the right to bear arms in Iowa would be struck down in court.</p> <p>Iowa is one of six states that does not have the right to bear arms in its constitution.</p> <h2>Support and opposition</h2> <p>Support for Amendment 1 includes the <a href="https://iowafc.org/iowas-freedom-amendment/">Iowa Firearms Coalition</a> and Republican state lawmakers.</p> <p>Supporters argue that this will allow Iowans to keep their guns with strong protections, due to the strict scrutiny requirements.</p> <p><a href="https://www.iowansforresponsiblegunlaws.com/about-1">Iowans for Responsible Gun Laws</a>, which is against the amendment, includes gun safety advocates and religious groups. </p> <p>Opponents say that the measure's strict scrutiny language will prevent lawmakers in the state from passing gun safety laws.</p> <h2>The money race</h2> <p>According to <a href="https://ballotpedia.org/Iowa_Amendment_1,_Right_to_Keep_and_Bear_Arms_Amendment_(2022)#cite_note-finance-6">Ballotpedia</a>, $30,798 has been raised in opposition of the measure. So far, no supporting committee has been identified.</p> <div class="read-original">Read the original article on <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/iowas-amendment-1-guns-right-to-keep-and-bear-arms-2022">Business Insider</a></div><!-- /wp:html -->

Amendment 1 would give citizens the right in the state constitution to bear arms.
Proponents say that it will help protect citizens’ right to carry and own firearms in the state.
Opponents say it will prevent lawmakers from passing gun safety laws.

A “yes” on Iowa’s Amendment 1 would amend the state’s constitution to give citizens a right to keep and bear arms.

Ballot measure details

Amendment 1 would add the following text to the state’s constitution: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The sovereign state of Iowa affirms and recognizes this right to be a fundamental individual right. Any and all restrictions of this right shall be subject to strict scrutiny.”

Strict scrutiny is the most restrictive form of judicial review. It requires proposed laws must have a compelling and specific government interest in order to violate an amendment. This would mean that many laws that could restrict the right to bear arms in Iowa would be struck down in court.

Iowa is one of six states that does not have the right to bear arms in its constitution.

Support and opposition

Support for Amendment 1 includes the Iowa Firearms Coalition and Republican state lawmakers.

Supporters argue that this will allow Iowans to keep their guns with strong protections, due to the strict scrutiny requirements.

Iowans for Responsible Gun Laws, which is against the amendment, includes gun safety advocates and religious groups. 

Opponents say that the measure’s strict scrutiny language will prevent lawmakers in the state from passing gun safety laws.

The money race

According to Ballotpedia, $30,798 has been raised in opposition of the measure. So far, no supporting committee has been identified.

Read the original article on Business Insider

By