Thu. Dec 19th, 2024

We’ve Done Lots for Ukraine, but Winning Will Take Much More<!-- wp:html --><p>Mustafa Ciftci/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images</p> <p>While the Western commitment to<a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-set-to-send-tanks-to-ukraine-after-months-of-hesitation-reports"> send tanks to Ukraine</a> was a welcome breakthrough, it should not be seen as a panacea. At this crucial juncture in the war between <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/putins-secret-attack-plan-would-be-ukrainian-nightmare">Russia and Ukraine</a>, the outcome of the conflict is far from clear and it will take at least two major shifts in U.S. and NATO policies to capitalize on the successes achieved by Kyiv during the past year.</p> <p>The first change required is to recognize that it is time to move toward an even more aggressive approach toward providing Ukraine with weapons, ammunition, and other vital supplies going forward. Welcome and essential as they have been, every provision of new weapons systems thus far has been a painstaking negotiation. Every step along the way toward providing more aid has been greeted by critics echoing Russian warnings that upgraded assistance to Ukraine could lead to potentially out-of-control escalation by Moscow. But that escalation has not happened. Russia’s capabilities have been proven to be far less than touted by them or by Western analysts before the war. They can’t beat Ukraine. They are not going to undertake a war against NATO that would lead to certain, swift disaster for Putin & Co.</p> <p>We must acknowledge this fact and confidently shift to a different aid footing. For three decades the U.S. has been guided by the so-called<a href="https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/explore-engage/classroom-resources/short-expert-videos-and-flipped-classroom/005-2"> Powell Doctrine</a> that states that if we enter a war we should do so with overwhelming force. Providing ourselves with narrow margins of advantage is seen as dangerous… because it is.</p> <p><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/david-rothkopf-writes-weve-done-lots-for-ukraine-but-winning-will-take-much-more?source=articles&via=rss">Read more at The Daily Beast.</a></p><!-- /wp:html -->

Mustafa Ciftci/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

While the Western commitment to send tanks to Ukraine was a welcome breakthrough, it should not be seen as a panacea. At this crucial juncture in the war between Russia and Ukraine, the outcome of the conflict is far from clear and it will take at least two major shifts in U.S. and NATO policies to capitalize on the successes achieved by Kyiv during the past year.

The first change required is to recognize that it is time to move toward an even more aggressive approach toward providing Ukraine with weapons, ammunition, and other vital supplies going forward. Welcome and essential as they have been, every provision of new weapons systems thus far has been a painstaking negotiation. Every step along the way toward providing more aid has been greeted by critics echoing Russian warnings that upgraded assistance to Ukraine could lead to potentially out-of-control escalation by Moscow. But that escalation has not happened. Russia’s capabilities have been proven to be far less than touted by them or by Western analysts before the war. They can’t beat Ukraine. They are not going to undertake a war against NATO that would lead to certain, swift disaster for Putin & Co.

We must acknowledge this fact and confidently shift to a different aid footing. For three decades the U.S. has been guided by the so-called Powell Doctrine that states that if we enter a war we should do so with overwhelming force. Providing ourselves with narrow margins of advantage is seen as dangerous… because it is.

Read more at The Daily Beast.

By