<!-- wp:html --><p>Reuters/Alexander Ermochenko</p>
<p><em>The Jerusalem Post </em>removed an article on Saturday that accused another outlet of misrepresenting a doll as a dead <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/keyword/palestine">Palestinian</a> baby. </p>
<p>After the article was originally published, social media users assailed the <em>Post</em>, arguing that the image did indeed depict a human infant. </p>
<p>The <em>Post </em>issued a <a href="https://twitter.com/Jerusalem_Post/status/1730991247416766516?t=49GCcWOHj_V21JSEx7yc0A&s=19">statement</a> following the retraction blaming the issue on “faulty sourcing.” <em> </em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/jerusalem-post-retracts-article-claiming-that-dead-palestinian-baby-was-a-doll">Read more at The Daily Beast.</a></p><!-- /wp:html --> Reuters/Alexander Ermochenko
The Jerusalem Post removed an article on Saturday that accused another outlet of misrepresenting a doll as a dead Palestinian baby.
After the article was originally published, social media users assailed the Post, arguing that the image did indeed depict a human infant.
The Post issued a statement following the retraction blaming the issue on “faulty sourcing.”